Well, I guess all you doubters can rest your case and accept that the Pohnpei State Governor is a man of his word. Today, many elementary schools are feeding lunch to students. Thanks to the Governor for living up to your promise and shutting up the many doubters. Even though I did not support the Governor during the election, once he was elected I give him my overwhelming support by not criticizing him openly like many in here. This is like a slap in your face people. Bravo Gov.!
The concern expressed by the legislature is that there is no funding to continue this program. Sources said that some reprograming were made by the executive to some appropriations which allowed this project to move forward. Can anyone enlighten us on the viability of the school lunch program in the long run?
how long can this "Lunch Program" go on? is it for just a couple of months? i mean, why start it up again? the kids are "Immune" to it now, they're used to it by now. don't get me wrong this is a good thing, but this good thing will surely take away from something. Are the kids being charged for the meals?
Reprogrammed $50k from the legislature appropriated funds for the repair of the MS Micro Glory. Didn't he also promised to purchase a new boat for the outer islanders? .....
More to come....now that he has terminated Ieske Ihesi from PPA....he will have plenty money to siphon off PPA. This is only foreplay....more to come
Keep the sissy slappin business at bay Quincy boy, your Govna idol will need it most to slap his sowy arse when an impeachment is finally reached for these desperate reprogramming and redirecting of approved budget purposes by law for this namesake promises he himself knew was impossible but did so to fool voters to voting him to kopznahhh.
Eh, the lousy lunch program is only occurring in select schools, and the lunch is TERRIBLE. My kid now in 1st grade brought his lunch home last week. Mannnn, every day Mackerel mackerel mackerel, and it was bland as can be. Too much water, eh? Now, my niece is in ECE and I hear that their budget has been cut and reprogrammed to elementary schools to feed others as well. Sometimes the ECE don't eat. What's up with that?
Quincy, don't forget that the Governor promised the hot lunch program to be available via the local fishermen and local produce farmers. Are our fishermen catching cans of mackerel now? Remember that the promise was not only to feed the students, but to also benefit the local fishermen and farmers via business with them. And also, quincy, please don't forget the Governor's promise to bring electricity from the waves on the reef as well as health insurance for the rural people - the farmers and fishermen.
bah! Kids eating mackerel while your Governor and his hefty cabinet members are eating REAL meals in the restaurants? Your Government sucks big time!!!
This is public record so I can give you a summary update on this matter.
Just recently the legislature conducted investigation into the matter and according to sworn testimonies made by key witnesses of the government, the information is indeed accurate as stated by Quincy that some elementary schools have started the school lunch program. This is both good news and bad because on one hand we want all our children fed at school, but on the other the law is clear that such program is not funded for financial constraints. While the executive does not see this as reprogramming, some believe it is which is contrary to law.
To give you a clearer picture of this delicate matter, we must start at the beginning. Before the transfer of the Head Start program into the mainstream educational system of the government, it was funded by the US. This funding was cut-off and through an amendment of the law, it was brought under the current State education system and now known as the Early Childhood Education. It is now being funded by the SEG of the Amended Compact with a vision to someday incorporate it fully under the fiscal control of the government. This is one aspect of the picture so stay with me.
Some time back, due to policy reasons of the US government, we ended the lunch program to elementary students mainly because we could no longer fund it. We, however, chose to continue the program at the high school level for several significant reasons. Among them is PICS location, etc. So as of today, two laws are in effect: 1. appropriation to Early Childhood Education funded by SEG (Supplemental Ed. Grants) and 2. appropriation to Secondary Education funded SGE (Sector Grants). What we don’t have is appropriation to Primary Education or Elementary School.
According to witnesses, the law does not prevent the Administration to divert monies allocated for the ECE and Secondary so it is within law to extend the program to the Primary level. While only the Court can confirm this, the legislature feels that as lawmakers, the intent of the two appropriations could not be more specific as it is plainly stated that only the two mentioned programs were funded. In other words, the legislature does not agree with the interpretation of the Executive branch.
As of now this is where we stand. Because this matter is one that I find appropriate for my participation, I will join you in further discussions should the need arises.
And as THE lawmakers, just what exactly if I may is the legislature intend on doing not for the sake of such so perceived "very specific" excuse of a discriminating law, but towards the state's middle child? What exactly is the culprit behind not supporting the governor for such a worthy investment in our PRIMARY school children? So is the general public to understand that it is and has been the Pohnpei State Legislators all along that did not want to feed our elementary students? As THE law makers, will it be that catastrophic to our state and our elementary school students if these ELECTED law makers once and for all correct the damage so far done to PRIMARY students and amend what needs amending to please all interpretations and move what's in the BEST interest of these future hopefuls forward in the people's order of business?
People, please calm down. One thing at a time. Pohnpei does not print money nor has plenty of it. Now the lunch program is on board the next may be the Micro Glory or a new ship if Micro Glory can not be repaired. Be patient and you willl be glorified.
Obviously and I would rather see cuts somewhere else beside what NEED be Priority One. Starting with the legislatures budget for the benefit of our Primary students...
Anything for primary students but Hot Lunch Program. The Governor did try to explain his reasons for suddenly thinking that a Hot Lunch is Priority for school children and his explanation was that a hungry student at school will not perform well in school. Excuse me???? and whose child was that? Was that your Child SOS? Certainly it wasn't my brother or sister, and I don't think it was your child either SOS. The point is, how many parents in Pohnpei send their kids off to school and let them starve at school? Are Pohnpeian parents that stupid??? I don't think so, and to me that is what the Governor seem to imply and tries to come to the rescue with his hot lunch program. If he was sending food to Africa, I would fully support it and may be even contribute 10% of my stipend to that worthy cause. but to think children of Pohnpei is starving is nothing more than an insult to pohnpeian parents. How about funding more textbooks, computer labs, a decent school library and buses instead of food that is already taken care of parents. Legislature already told him there is no money for his fantasy hot lunch program. What part of that message does he not understand? hot lunch is not a priority for our school children for that is part of the responsibility of a parent to his or her child. We don't need Government interference in that. Government should go on with their job of providing enough school materials and pay raises to outstanding teachers and incentives for outstanding students and that money wherever he may have plucked it from that has already began some lunches as some of you have stated should be put into the scholarship fund bucket for more reservations for future student needs. I don't support Government to feed me. I have more food on my land than the Government has in their cafeteria. Support me and give a pencil and paper to write on, a book to read a teacher and a classroom to sit in away from the rain and scholarships to help me through college is all I need.
raygun, with such proud and ignorant mind you might as well crawl back into a hole and just hide from the sun. You would rather contribute 10% of your @#$% for a cause half way around the world regardless of stench around you which you are oblivious to? Who the heck is talking about starving here? More food on your land than the government has in their cafeteria? Please step out of your tiny hole and see the real world. Providing for your kids meal while they are under your care, your watch and your roof hell yea! But in the care of the PUBLIC school system, the government MUST not DISCRIMINATE no matter what sex, race, color, religion and or STATUS! If you want to provide better lunches for your kids then it’s your right, but don’t for one minute tell me what I can’t expect and or demand from my elected law makers that has the power to amend laws in the name of justice for all PUBLIC school children regardless of category. If Early Childhood Education and Secondary Education are Funded then why the hell not Primary? Is man made for his laws or his laws made for him?
I reminisce the days when I was in primary school (public elementary somwhere in Kolonia Town). We were able to eat, drink and being merry with our studies with a full stomach. Times and things have changed...right...why not we, as parents (through PTAs) contribute and play our role in trying to prepare lunches for our very kids. I think Government has gone way forward to providing all, if not most of what is needed as far as educating a child is concerned.
I noted some schools (public schools) within our region, PTAs had addressed this very same issue and are assisting through innovative ways in catering for their children at schools...be it fundraisings...assigning groups time to prepare food, scheduling of turns for the preparation of lunches, involvement of local farmers, etc, etc, etc. After all, through effective PTAs, we need not to be mindful...of what is being served, as we will surely know what is being prepared daily for our children...and if possible, guaranteeing them a healthy meal...isn't it.
I may be wrong, but am very positive and always think that "NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE"
Call this a problem, I call it a piece of cake! If you're one of the countless frustrated parents then file this matter in Court. Gather as many supporters as you can and let the justice system do it's purpose. We leave in a DEMOCRATIC State are we not?
How about I just kick you butt. Then after that you and your idol kopzna can hug each other and go jump off a cliff over the sunset, hand in hand.
Your kopzna, told the population of Pohnpei that he WILL provide hot lunches for students. He made such a promise without prior consultation and research if that promise is possible. Now, he gets elected and comes aboard and toss the promise to Legislature to fund, just like that! What a joke! Is that his money? Is his campaign promise priority over all other State needs?
To my fellow LawMakers, what's taking so long to impeach this nitwit???
One of the roles of the legislature is to enact laws conducive to State’s interest. Such calls for the legislature to embark on sound policies, regardless of popularity, to protect State’s resources from collapse should it sees it as the only option. What we have is a dilemma on our hand where everyone, including all our leaders, wants to find a way to make available lunch to all students currently under the direct care of the government.
Nonetheless, any undertaking of this nature must be in line with the available resources of the State and that I mean by financial ability. Simply put, do we have the money to pay for school lunch program at the Primary level? In order to answer this, we must take into consideration some key facts. The Amended Compact is the only source of funding for our entire educational system at the State level and this is through the Education Sector Grants. Because the Head Start was then under the Education Programs funded under the SEG, it was argued in the US Congress that we were “double-dipping” by getting both the Education Sector Grants and Education Programs (SEG). To make the long story short, OIA (pardon the acronyms) now retains the power to review and grant which programs can be funded under the SEG. Early Childhood Education is one such program. So here is where we are at the moment, Primary and Secondary Education is funded by the Education Sector Grants and Early Childhood Education is funded by Supplementary Education Grants (SEG).
Now this is where the school lunch program fits in as far as the Primary level is concerned. There is no available funding given to the Primary Level from both the Education Sector Grants and SEG. Bare in mind that when I referred to appropriations from the legislature in my earlier post, any grants given to the State must go through appropriations by the legislature and this is to uphold the sovereignty issue.
I will take a break and continue later… and loosen guys for I will try to provide you the whole picture so you can make a better judgement on this issue. peace
raygun don't sway the real issue here. Stick you nose to where it matter not to you or your fellow LawMakers, but to the COURT of LAW which everyone is protected under, including discriminated against school children. At least the governor see this wrong and doing his part to correct it under the legislators noses. No fund and yet non-stop government travel? Who's the nitwit? Many have tried what you think you can and find that it's much harder than you think so here's an advice right back at you. You go hold hands with your visionless elected lawmakers whoever they are and hand in hand lovingly jump off a cliff. I promise not to kick yours, but will just charm you into doing it with common sense, lol.
Do a little more research om impeachment before even uttering it. If discrimination don't ring a bell up there then I don't see how screaming "impeachment" can sit well...
There seems to be a sense of entitlement in this thread that I don't really understand. What I think I'm hearing is that the Government, since it requires you by law to send your school aged child to the PUBLIC school should also feed your school aged child. After all, they're the ones forcing your school aged child to go to a PUBLIC school. That seems like an odd argument to me.
I may be wrong here since I'm pulling the following opinion from thin air in which case I'd like to know about it, but doesn't every government require parents to participate in the cost of feeding their own children when they are in school if they are financially able to do so whether that participation comes through a small daily charge for school lunches or extraordinarily high rates of taxation such as occurs in Socialist structures?
No one should ever force anyone to send their kids to PUBLIC school. And in the same token no child should be discriminated against as far as funding for this or funding for that.
If one should not receive then all should not PERIOD!
Vanu, One of the most dangerous combinations of the human species in today's world is a LAW MAKER with nothing more than political motives. But even such eventually fall under the mercy of the Justice System especially when and if the means does not fairly justify the end. If I employ three individuals to nothing more than learn under my care, my watch and my roof, can I offer a certain benefit say lunch for two and not for one for the mere reason that I do not have enough funding? Are all three not entitled to the same lunch benefit? What's your take?
The Executive, in my opinion, should be commended for believing in this cause and instigation the program on its own regardless of it knowing whether future funding will be available or not. In every country, a leader must take a stand and I think the Governor did just just that. A request was sent by the administration to OIA for approval of administering school lunch program at the Primary Level and the response was that yes it could be made only as a start-up undertaking, meaning future funding under the compact will not be approved. So the simple answer is that this school lunch program will only be funded on a temporary basis from the Compact funds.
At the same time, we must also thank ourselves for voting in some of these Senators whom are doing their very best to serve the people by enacting legislation which are core to state interest, even under outside pressure for their unpopularity, but yet must be made regardless. In the end, what everyone should know is the reasons behind these legislation which is something I look forward to promote.
Nevertheless, this leaves us with an unanswered question, how will we fund the program after the initial start-up taking into consideration that this initial start-up was not extended to all the primary schools? Where can we get the $$$$ to support this immense undertaking on a permanent basis? That, my friends, is one of the concern of some of our lawmakers.
If this issue is to be brought to court, this is what I think the Court will answer? Does the legislation allow room for diversion of funds as done by the executive? Some may say yes since the legislation are silent on the issue and there are others who may take a positivist approach that the law is as it is written. Either way, as Pohnpeians, I think our role here is to tell our leaders what we think will best serve our State.
and SOS,
I can promise you that not a single member of the Pohnpei State Legislature opposes the school lunch program. Everyone is for it, it's just that this matter is much broader than our narrow minded prejudices. See you tomorrow. Peace out...
What else can BEST serve our State than investing every penny in our future, our children, our hope for a better tomorrow?
Well, as one of those "narrow minded prejudices" wouldn't it resound a deafening FAIRNESS in the ears of the INFORMED majority to cut one, cut all? I stand on the firm believe that democracy MUST work for the majority. Tell me, where does the majority of students reside? Is it because these students don't vote? What if this relates to the majority of those that vote, would any law maker think one thing and does another? Cut budget elsewhere to fund everything concerning EDUCATION of those that will be our future to it's fullest and that includes textbooks, labs, lunches, desk and what have you. Investing in our future hopefuls in it's fullest is a must and to caste out one group of studentS(Majority) while embracing another plus one is in my "narrow minded prejudice" mind an upside down vision, lol. The only way to get to the bottom of this is for a parent or parents to take this matter to COURT and see just where such narrow minded prejudices really reside, lol. Yea, 'em so call law makers should kneel and thank God my kids are in the U.S.A. public school system, lol.
There's no sleeping on the job at hand and it's not only the governor's responsibility to work the state budget to make this well worth investment possible. Yes, he brought it up to the attention of everyone counting on full support especially from Pohnpei State legislators since it concerns Pohnpei's public school children. What, he's the only one that care about this injustice or is it that he did not politely ask legislators first? Make use of those coconut shells and work with the executive branch to see where cuts can be made for the benefit of ALL Pohnpei's school children not only SOME. I bet the governor will be more than willing to cut some areas in the executive budget given the legislative branch compromise. Is this what the legislature is really afraid of? Compromising the comfort of their offices for the sake of ALL public school children? SOS.......SOS.........SOS........ Pohnpei PRIMARY Students NEED help!!!
Hey, I'm just here to do my part in waking up all concerned parents and students alike!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We must also thank ourselves for voting in some of these Senators whom are doing their very best to serve the people by enacting legislation which are core to state interest, even under outside pressure for their unpopularity, but yet must be made regardless? How will we fund the program after the initial start-up taking into consideration that this initial start-up was not extended to all the primary schools? Where can we get the $$$$ to support this immense undertaking on a permanent basis?
How about facing the REAL HARD decisions once and for all for the sake of Pohnpei's public school children. Like how many senators do we really need to move the people's agenda through the legislative chamber? I wonder just how many senators will oppose cutting the number of senators for the sake of continue funding for this initial start-up initiative for public school children and how many are willing to go down that road? It won't make much of a difference? Well, by leading in this cut I'm positive senators can in turn expect the same through tough decisions passed through chambers calling for just such cuts from other areas of the Pohnpei state government no? Lead by example then enact hard decisions in especially these really tough times for none other than, yup you guessed it OUR kids!!!
Then PLEASE stay out of this cheapness oh moron, lol. okeefe, many many many parents voted for the governor for bringing up this injustice to ALL elementary students that our legislators keep avoiding for the sake of MAJOR cuts to where cuts need be. That says a lot about what many many many of these parents would like very much to be provided to ALL public school children, not just SOME. It's not a matter of who can or can't feed their kids, but rather a matter of showing that discriminating against one group is a definate NO NO!
Well, just how many senators does it take to screw on the light bulb for the State of Pohnpei?
That's the impression the Kopzna is telling the people of Pohnpei. He forgot that he is the only parent that has neglected his children and wife and the child support case that still lingers in the Pohnpei Supreme Court awaiting to reach its invalidity as his children will reach 18 yrs of age and child support is automatically canceled. He should butt out of family matters as the only family matter he knows is saving his crooked brothers businesses in which they successfully ousted Pohnpei's only Harvard University Graduate, former Pohnpei Port authority General Manager, Iehske Iehsi for doing his job the honest and right way. I say Legislature should not give in in this none sense hot lunch program and any other campaign promises this incompetent Kopzna and his administration seeks. Legislature is our only last hope in breaking this corruption in the Executive Branch. Keep up the good work Vanuatu and pls advise your lawmakers wisely. All eyes are on you and the legislators. Forgive SOS, he does not know what he's saying.
I am making an effort to give concerned readers the insides of this matter so they can best understand the real facts behind the school lunch program. This is not a quarrel of any sort, at least not on my part. I am sure SOS, as a parent, has every right to vent out her frustrations on this important matter and I do appreciate the fact that she, like any concerned parent, would want to see the school lunch program materialize on a permanent basis.
I also have children directly affected with this matter and I ask nothing less than our leaders sitting down and work out a plan to move this forward. However, the fact of the matter is that this initial start up will end at the end of this fiscal year. Any future funding will come from the General Fund. I have no direct information of our purse, but past experiences have seen very little carry over funds which leads me to believe that we may not be able to fund it. Our projected local revenue falls below what we are accustomed to which also tells me that harder times are on the horizon. This does not include that fact that the Compact drawdown is slowly making an impact on our budget. Tougher times are still to come and we must make every effort configure our government in anticipation of its effects. But, then, what do we do, should we just fold and let time dictates our future?
I am a firm believer human ingenuity, that with every problem lies an answer. Even if the answer is not what we really want, we must be willing to take on the challenges through creative ways to arrive as adequate end. If this means sacrificing the school lunch program to protect expected job loss, I am for it if the overall end result is more beneficial to the people.
The majority of people in Pohnpei have become accustomed to and accepted that parents must share a role in their children education. Whether it's through contributing a small amount of money to buy a loaf of bread for lunch or community support of providing soup for a quarter, just like what parents do at Saladak, this is all in the name of role sharing. This is what caring parents do, but I am not ignorant of the fact that some parents find it hard to make ends meet. However, if I am a good parent my role in raising my child is 24 hours a day and that includes meals three times a day just like I do on Saturdays and Sundays.
I know my views may not sit well with many, but I would rather have a functioning government in the long run rather than one that is colluded with politics. This is my view and this is how I see it.
raygun please take your trash talking to the nimwen kainen. I don't give a shit about what you think the legislature should do with whatever the governor has done in his personal life. What the governor has with any government establishment that affects that establishment should be dealt with by proper authorities if there are grounds for such. Until then, keep your trash talking to your narrow minded self, it will benefit no one especially those elementary students that are the focus here. Tell me this narrow minded raygun, how many senators does Pohnpei have as of this moment? I forgive you for not knowing what you say, lol.
Then let's talk tough choices and real responsibility here. How many senators are representing each municipality and what is the current population of Pohnpei State?
You are taking this healthy exchange in a manner not suited for my response, I have provided you with all the information which affects this matter and I believe I have done my part. I shall take my leave and only return if you gals tone down your personal attacks.
What is the only way to decrease the number of Senators? Constitutional Amendment, correct. So, didn't we just have a convention that discussed the issue and decided that it is not a good idea at the moment? Is that your answer to this current proplem, to reduce the number of senators? Why not give us your formula and tie it with what is at discussion here? Your comments and all hate comments directed at our leaders is like dog shit on the road, you see it and walk the other way. Let's work with Vanuatu in identifying solutions, shall we?
Vanu my passion for being "fair & open" often precedes the best part of waking up with folgers in mwua's hand, lol. See vanu, I touched this area because both you and I know that most common Pohnpeian families don't really know what goes on behind close doors in our government and if taking the fall is what it will take for this concerned citizen to expose some of the choices that our government officials will forever avoid then so be it. It might as well be SOS taking the fall for the common people, the likes of which most of us that grew up with will forever defend. You want human ingenuity? Then look no further than the LEGISLATIVE body. In the name of justice or fairness and openness for all our citizens especially our future, let us start there using our human ingenuity to really dissect to reorganize our bloated government to cut unnecessary costs here to fund worthy causes there. We keep talking about acting in the best interest of our people and yet when it comes to those that will be our future we consider just to keep avoiding the basic yet vital needs of our elementary students? What some of you see as justified due to lack of funds this nobody sees it as an excuse to avoid cutting where cuts are really needed mainly for political motives, re-election. Am I the only one that believe that it’s time to cut spending where cut must be made first especially now that our only bread and butter the compact funding is dwindling? With the legislators stepping forward to lead by example in this cause, wouldn’t human ingenuity lead to other cost cutting measures that will indeed be tough and unpopular but nonetheless justify the end given the means by which such tough decision came into being? Nothing personal, just much much passion towards what is FAIR for the MAJORITY.
Just what exactly is human ingenuity as WE Pohnpeians see it?
Mustafa, what you see as shit some will see as bold and by golly it's time to grill those we elect to look out for the MAJORITY not self security job wise that is. This comes with the territory and if you can't stand the heat as an elected representative then kindly step aside so tax payers money can be put to better use. I had no idea that it has been decided to safe the politicians jobs especially seeing all the struggles to make ends meet here and there. Can you please provide the population of Pohnpei as of today Mustafa and the current number of senators? My formula don't matter, what matters is that we observe that facts upon which we would rather safe jobs for the few on account of the MAJORITY.
Well, how many senators does it take to screw Pohnpei?
I see that you are inviting me for a debate in politics and I shall entertain your request as long as our aim is directed to one solution which addresses the school lunch program, afterall this is the issue of this thread. Any job cuts, whether at the legislature, executive, or court must be in line with the direction of our government. Should we cut jobs for the sole reason that we want our children fed at school? We currently sit at around 20% to 30% jobless ratio nation wide which is far higher than the US, if the statistics I see is accurate. So, how much more jobs can we affort to cut taking into consideration the number of affected people will be involved? For the sake of one meal, are we willing put families in peril because one meal is more important than an entire family's yearly income? This is a difficult choice, but this is the fact that will eventually happen when cutting jobs. Furthermore, cutting jobs do not necessarily means saving money because in the end, tax collection will be decreased. This is a two way street that must be studied carefully and should not be thought of as the curing answer to the school lunch program.
I am sure a lot of discussion was made on the Foreign Investment Law and who knows, maybe the answer is right at our feet and all we have to do is act on it. Now, tell me how your plan to cut job at the legislature can save the school lunch program and give me your formula on how to go about doing it?
The discussion led to cost cutting here to fund well worth start-up funding there due to what you’ve raised base on how to continue funding for meals for ALL not just some but ALL public school children. I led you down this path to point out what your human ingenuity can indeed bear if we so desire to fund what must not only be for the few, but ALL public school children. Would you define discrimination otherwise seeing how setup has been until this start-up funding came into being? You mentioned quite eloquently I might add, about the need for tough decisions. Well, do we just save jobs say at the legislative body due to their family’s sake without really looking into how to best reorganize and fund this body for the sake of our dwindling compact funding? If we want to talk tough decisions, then why not walk it first.
Going back to the lunch program, do you expect parents to continue to turn the other way knowing that some kids are getting lunch meals while the majority are not? How do we define discrimination in Pohnpei again? As much as I would love to HELP provide you with that illusive golden formula that will just solve all our problems, I’ll reiterate that sole responsibility rests upon those that have chosen to run for such office to reap the comfortable pay that comes with it so you’ll just have to help those you advice with what you’ve got. Again, we ended up discussing funding from me touching why some students have lunch while the majority don’t.
Hey, but do not despair vanu, that human ingenuity can learn a lot from comparing figures with a not so distant island many many many Pohnpeians continue to flock to for employment and education. So the question should be shall we continue to avoid cuts for the sake of a few families or FULLY commit to investing in our children’s future to include not only lunches but the deteriorating states of our public school system? Providing a decent meal as nourishment for the mind while under the care of the PUBLIC school system is just the beginning, by no means are we anywhere near being done. So you tell me…
Your explanation above tells me you don't know shiet on how to go about doing what you blabber too much about in this forum. Just admit it. You don't know shiet, but you won't accept defeat, so you go on spilling your IQ contents as if anybody is even reading it. lol. Park it and throw the keys away lil guy. You've been served str8ght Up! wahahaha!
And your vocabs tells me you know a lot? Do me a huge favor and let those that see way past tomorrow speak their minds in hea, lol. Stick to baby stuff, it will do much good to the elementary minds. I'm well served where I'm currently at so thank you and keep your foul breath to yourself. Defeat? I'm here putting out my concern for what the likes of you don't see and if that's defeat then I'll marvel in it while I still breathe. You on the other hand only stink up my breathing space whenever you appear so please buy listerine, it might help. LOL